Inside new CFTC chair nominee’s crypto, prediction market views

In 2025, the US gaming industry has become captivated by the workings of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) like never before.

Apprehension started to mount in February over the possibility of Ohio Republican Brian Quintenz becoming the next chair of the CFTC. Quintenz, a former CFTC commissioner nominated that month by US President Donald Trump, had direct ties to prediction markets as a sitting board member for Kalshi. Additionally, Quintenz publicly advocated for another exchange, ErisX, in its failed attempt to offer sports contracts in 2021.

Now, Quintenz’s nomination has been pulled after multiple hiccups, and Trump this week announced a new nominee: Michael Selig. Selig’s expertise is cryptocurrency, from both a regulatory and legal perspective.

While the gaming industry has been focused primarily on prediction markets, the Quintenz-Selig shuffle could signify that crypto is the real prize at stake. Yet with Quintenz also heavily involved in crypto himself, it could also just be more of the same.

Who is Michael Selig, the new CFTC chair nominee?

Selig currently serves as chief counsel of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Crypto Task Force, and as a senior advisor to SEC Chair Paul Atkins. Back in 2014-15, Selig also worked in the office of former CFTC commissioner J. Christopher Giancarlo, per LinkedIn.

Giancarlo was a commissioner at the time Selig worked for him, but he went on to become CFTC chair in 2017 during Trump’s first term. He has since adopted the nickname “Crypto Dad” for his support of digital assets and published a book under that title in 2021.

David Sacks, Trump’s so-called “AI and Crypto Czar”, said in an X post that Selig has “been instrumental in driving forward the President’s crypto agenda” at the SEC, adding that he and Selig will “deliver on President Trump’s promise to make the U.S. the crypto capital of the planet”.

In response, Selig posted that he would “work tirelessly to facilitate Well-Functioning Commodity Markets, promote Freedom, Competition and Innovation, and help the President make the United States the Crypto Capital of the World”.

Quintenz nomination lost early momentum

Quintenz’s candidacy, if charted on a prediction market, might look like something of a bad beat. It started strong, but the longer his nomination dragged on without confirmation, the more things started to unravel.

Quintenz faced questioning during a Senate hearing in June but his confirmation vote was twice delayed afterward, abruptly and last-minute both times. In July, the release of internal CFTC emails through a FOIA request from The Closing Line newsletter suggested undue access for the yet-unconfirmed Quintenz.

Then, billionaire crypto twins Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss got involved, leading Quintenz to distance himself in September by posting threatening messages he had received from Tyler. The messages claimed the CFTC “abused” its power in previous legal action against Gemini, the twins’ crypto trading platform.

“It’s my understanding that after this exchange they contacted the President and asked that my confirmation be paused for reasons other than what is reflected in these texts,” Quintenz posted on X.

The White House puled his nomination 30 September before nominating Selig weeks later.

CFTC chair candidates share multiple similarities

Between the two nominees, Selig has fewer direct connections to prediction markets than Quintenz. But there are some connections, and Quintenz’s crypto experience ultimately could make the two more similar than not.

According to InGame, Selig’s name appears on a July 2024 letter submitted by venture capital firm Paradigm Operations to the CFTC in support of Kalshi’s legitimacy as a prediction market.

Kalshi had not begun offering sports contracts at the time, but Paradigm argued that “the CFTC’s characterization of political contests, awards contests, and sporting events as forms of ‘gaming’ is arbitrary and capricious”. Selig was among three attorneys from the firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP representing Paradigm. The VC firm would go on to invest in Kalshi this year.

Quintenz, for his part, is also heavily involved in crypto. He became an advisor to Crypto.com months after leaving the CFTC in late 2021, and spent the past four years at Andressen Horowitz (or a16z), a crypto-focused VC firm. Since late 2022, Quintenz has served as its head of policy for crypto. His tenure as a CFTC commissioner also aligned with Giancarlo’s tenure as chair.

Based on these points, it remains to be seen whether gaming stakeholders would view Selig as a more favourable candidate by comparison.

Regulatory questions at play for CFTC, SEC

Since Trump took office for his second term in January, crypto advancement has been a key goal for the administration. The GENIUS Act, the most significant regulatory bill for digital assets introduced in the US to date, was signed into law in July. Another similar bill, the CLARITY Act, passed the House in July but has been sitting in the Senate since September.

Prediction markets have not seen the same level of legislative or regulatory clarity. Acting CFTC Chair Caroline Pham hosted a meeting with tribal gaming stakeholders earlier this year but did little to assuage their concerns. In an advisory issued in late September, the CFTC gave no concrete guidance and essentially said it has yet to determine the validity of sports contracts.

In the meantime, the influx of new crypto rules could put the SEC and CFTC in tough spots with regard to oversight and delineation. Both agencies have historically been independent of one another. As their names suggest, the SEC primarily oversees securities like stocks and bonds, while the CFTC oversees commodities and derivatives.

Various forms of digital assets like crypto might not fall neatly within one box or another. Notably, Selig has had intimate dealings with both agencies in his career thus far.

The two agencies in September held a unique roundtable discussing possible regulatory synergies. Among the panelists were Kalshi’s Tarek Mansour and Polymarket’s Shayne Coplan, though neither participated much. Crypto interests were also well-represented by officials from Crypto.com, Robinhood and Kraken.

Before Selig’s nomination, a sense energed among observers that the SEC’s Atkins was gaining momentum as a potential CFTC chair candidate as well. Such a consolidation would have been unprecedented, but the subsequent roundtable was perhaps an indication that their relationship is aligning closer.

Crypto interests dwarf prediction markets

The true breadth of the CFTC’s remit was perhaps best shown in Quintenz’s Senate hearing. For almost two hours, lawmakers presented questions about agriculture, ranching, commodities, crypto, and, to a much lesser degree, event contracts on prediction markets.

That divide in priorities seems to be more apparent as the saga plays out. It was the crypto-focused Winklevosses, not the collective furor of the regulated gaming industry, that proved to be Quintenz’s downfall, and perhaps for good reason: the crypto market this summer eclipsed a total market value of $4 trillion.

By comparison, nationwide gross revenue this year from casinos, sports betting and iGaming combined was $51.1 billion through August, per the American Gaming Association. Sports betting, the vertical most closely associated with prediction markets, accounted for $10 billion of that.

Prediction markets are also small in scope when compared to crypto’s trillions. Leading exchanges Kalshi and Polymarket are garnering multibillion-dollar valuations but there are few other significant players as of yet. Additionally, gaming companies like FanDuel, DraftKings and Robinhood have already launched or are planning to launch prediction markets, which could saturate the market.

Prediction markets make money off trading commissions and other transaction fees. As such, the exchanges often see billions in weekly trading volume (not directly equivalent to sportsbook handle) but their revenue is only a fraction of that.

Notably, though, prediction markets do not have to pay state gaming or federal excise taxes, nor do they have responsible gaming obligations to answer for.

Trump administration connected to both sides

The connections to both crypto and prediction markets are everywhere in Trump’s administration. Donald Trump Jr. is an advisor to both Kalshi and Polymarket, having endorsed them after they correctly predicted his father’s election victory last November. 1789 Capital, a firm backed by Trump Jr., invested in Polymarket this year.

Things went a step farther this month with the announcement that Trump’s media arm will offer prediction markets through a partnership with Crypto.com. The contracts will be available to users directly through Trump’s Truth Social platform.

Trump is constructing a $300 million ballroom at the White House that was privately funded by 37 donors. The donor list featured some traditional gaming stakeholders but is littered with crypto connections, including:

• The Winklevoss twins
• Coinbase, a crypto exchange platform
• Ripple, a blockchain payments network
• Tether America, a blockchain payments network
• Charles Cascarilla, co-founder of blockchain payments network Paxos

If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em?

An ironic part of the prediction market-crypto discussion is that the regulated industry would likely pursue both verticals if their licences would not be at risk by doing so. The push by some companies to enter the prediction market space is evidence of that, and those that have not have largely blamed regulatory uncertainty.

Caesars Entertainment CEO Tom Reeg said this week his company won’t put “any licences” at risk to pursue prediction market deals. He also asserted Caesars “is preparing and would be prepared to go down that path” if clarity comes.

Mike Dreitzer, chairman of the Nevada Gaming Control Board, indicated earlier this month he would be open to bringing prediction market technology under state law if able.

There are similar feelings for crypto, which is a popular payment method for younger players. At the ICE Barcelona conference in January, a panel of three international CEOs — Per Widerstrom (evoke), Gavin Isaacs (Entain) and Fabio Schiavolin (Snaitech) — all lamented that unregulated platforms can utilise crypto while they cannot.

“All three of us would dream to be in the unregulated market just for a day,” Schiavolin joked at the time.

FanDuel founder now leaning into crypto

Those who are venturing into crypto despite the regulatory gruff are seeing the benefits. Nigel Eccles, co-founder and former CEO of FanDuel, has started a new crypto-based iGaming venture called BetHog.

The platform is not licenced or available in the US, but Eccles has embraced crypto as the new frontier, much like he did with daily fantasy sports in the early-to-mid 2010s. DFS is where FanDuel and DraftKings got their start, which at the time was also unregulated. Both have since grown to become the biggest regulated sports betting and iGaming companies in the US.

“We’ve got a very clear signal from the federal government that [crypto] is a technology we should embrace,” Eccles told iGB. “We’ve got really clear operator interest. And so I do feel at a state level, a state regulator level, it is only a matter of time” before the benefits outweigh the risks, he said.

Eccles said security and anti-money laundering (AML) risks are the biggest barriers holding crypto back from gaming. But he argued the traceability of crypto makes it more secure than fiat currency, and individualised wallets help protect against fraud and chargebacks.

From a functional standpoint, Eccles contends that operators would save tremendously on money-moving fees, which eat away at margins. This, in turn, could allow for more bonusing to players or other similar benefits.

“Instead of giving 15 % of our revenue straight out the door to Visa and MasterCard, we can actually give a chunk of that back to the player and say, ‘look, you can have a better experience,’” Eccles said.